
The Supreme Court of India has granted interim bail to renowned filmmaker Vikram Bhatt and his wife, Shwetambari Bhatt, in a significant ₹30 crore cheating case originating from Rajasthan. This development comes after the couple challenged the Rajasthan High Court's earlier decision to deny them bail. The apex court's ruling marks a crucial turn in the high-profile legal battle.
The Allegations and Background The case revolves around serious allegations of funds diversion that were reportedly collected for film production. Dr. Ajay Murdia, associated with Indira Group of Companies, which includes Indira IVF and Indira Entertainment LLP, filed the complaint. Reports indicate that Bhatt and his wife were taken into custody in December 2025 and subsequently remanded to judicial custody, highlighting the gravity of the accusations.
Supreme Court Intervention
• Challenging High Court: The couple approached the Supreme Court after the Jodhpur Bench of the Rajasthan High Court rejected their bail application on January 31.
• Legal Arguments: Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Bhatts, questioned the necessity of jailing the director and his wife. Conversely, the State vehemently opposed the plea, emphasizing the magnitude of the alleged ₹30 crore fraud.
• Judicial Observation: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi presided over the Bench. Justice Bagchi notably observed, “But you cannot use these cases to recover money,” questioning the use of criminal law mechanisms for financial recovery during the hearing.
• Bail Conditions: The Supreme Court issued notice in the petition and directed that Vikram Bhatt and Shwetambari Bhatt be released on interim bail upon furnishing the required bail bonds. They also sought a response from the Rajasthan government and ordered the owner of Indira Entertainment LLP to be impleaded as a respondent.
Next Steps in the Case The matter has been scheduled for further hearing on February 19. The Court will reconvene to consider the responses filed by all parties involved, promising more developments in this evolving legal saga.


